Thursday 15 May 2014

Why X-Men: The Last Stand is worthy … but X-Men: Origins Wolverine is not

These two films in X-Men franchise have been the most complained about by a lot of fans and some critics. So I thought I’d deliver my honest opinion on these films.

Before I start, I should say this review is very spoiler-heavy. Also I am not a comic-book reader, although I have read about the source material and I have watched the 1992 animated series, which I heard is very faithful to the comic. I should also note that the first film was pretty much my first experience with X-Men, I knew of the comics and the animated series which I didn’t start watching until after seeing X-Men: The Last Stand.

X-Men: The Last Stand

While this has flaws, I do not think this is a bad film by any means. The biggest problem I have is that there are too many characters and it should’ve been longer, so some of them could’ve benefitted with more screen time. Is that why they didn’t involve Nightcrawler?

What saves this film for me is the chances it took, they had to have known a lot of fans would rage against these decisions but they felt were worth taking the risk for.

It didn’t bother me that Cyclops and Xavier were killed by the Phoenix in the first half, not only is this one of the few superhero films with the balls to go to kill off big characters but it also raises the stakes. The Phoenix is a genuine threat to our heroes, whether it’s Jean or not, and losing Cyclops and Professor X gives us that danger. The X-Men begin to lose hope and they learn to fight as a team with what they have left and knowing that they could die. I don’t recall the Phoenix causing any harm in the animated series (yes I know it’s a kids show).

Yes it does kind of suck that Mystique loses her powers and Magneto’s abandonment of her is heartbreaking. The scene is successful, not only does it make you feel sorry for a villain but the sight of Rebecca Romijn naked does not detract from it. This moment reminds me of when Bobby’s family disowns him for being a mutant in X-Men 2, in this case Magneto disowns Mystique for being human. It does show that prejudice is a two-way street and that it overshadows the love you have.

Rogue taking the cure has annoyed a lot of the fans, I’m not bothered so much because her tragic arc justifies her doing so. The film doesn’t set out to tell us that taking the cure was the right thing or wrong thing, it was that they had the right to choose, as she says “It’s what I wanted”. It should also noted there is an episode in the animated where Rogue was considering getting her powers taken away which she didn’t go ahead with. So I praise this film taking that chance with her going through with it. Yes, I know Rogue’s not the same tough, kick-ass woman from the comic and animated series and it’s kind of underwhelming that she was downgraded to a vulnerable teenage girl. But I do think vulnerable can be just as interesting as strong, by stripping away all the strength we are left with a sympathetic character who is afraid of her own power, she can’t touch anyone without causing serious harm to them. They do a great job using the character to portray the tragedy of being a mutant. Just watch the train scene in the first film and try not to feel sorry for this character; I just wanted to hug her, even if it killed me. That being said it would still be cool to see badass Rogue in the future sequels, if you watch True Blood then you know that Anna Paquin can play a tough southerner.

Hugh Jackman is awesome as usual, as well as the returning cast Patrick Stewart, Rebecca Romijn, Anna Paquin, Shawn Ashmore, James Marsden. Both Ian Mckellen and Halle Berry get the chance to upgrade their performances as Magneto and Storm from the first two films. New to the cast – Kelsey Gramer as Beast (absolute perfect casting), Ellen Page as Shadowcat, Ben Foster as Angel (wasted but great casting), Vinnie Jones as Juggernaut.

The one that steals the show for me is Famke Janssen as Jean Grey/The Phoenix. There’s been a lot of complaints the Phoenix saga has been ruined, honestly I didn’t know anything about it before seeing the film so as a first-timer I enjoyed this plot. Easily my favourite in the film. It was an interesting look at multiple personalities and how far someone can be pushed to breaking point. It’s also a look at consequences of taking regretful actions- Professor X, trying to psychically contain the Phoenix, thinking he’s doing the right thing but ends up making it worse. I find that more effective than having her go to space and be possessed by a cosmic force. Famke Janssen doesn’t overplay it with shouting or laughing, she plays it with subtlety and successes at being both scary and sympathetic. The final confrontation between Phoenix and Wolverine was very emotional, the decision for Wolverine to kill Jean was very well handled, I’m grateful that The Wolverine shows us what an impact killing Jean has on him. The look of the Phoenix has been questioned like – why not use the fiery eyes and fire-bird? Why black eyes and black veins on her face? Here’s an explanation I came up with, which may get contradicted if future sequels decide to revisit it – The fire was the “Light Phoenix” that Jean was in control of, her powers would’ve evolved whether the beast in her was freed or not. The fire in her is shown when she is being heroic, deflecting the missile and the flood. The fire-bird in the water was probably more of a symbol of her evolving power (presumably from good Jean’s subconscious while she was cocooned) which goes with her ending monologue. The black eyes and veins is the “Dark Phoenix”. There are subtle fire references notice her eyes go a golden colour before turning black, and her black eyes have a fiery tint in the middle. Also her hair kind of resembles fire, as it seems to have an orange glow and the way it flows.

This is also the first X-Men film to have a full-fledged battle between X-team and the Brotherhood. While it sucks that Mystique, Rogue, Nightcrawler and Cyclops were not involved, it was still an awesome battle sequence.

My favourite scene in the film, probably the whole franchise, is the Grey house sequence – we got Wolverine vs. Juggernaut, Storm vs. Callisto. But Phoenix vs. Professor X as the house rises was epic, had me on the edge of my seat.




X-Men Origins: Wolverine

This is the only X-Men film I really don’t care for. While I don’t think it’s awful, I don’t really see that much point to it. The film starts off in the right place, from Logan discovering his claws for the first time as a child to his relationship to his brother to meeting Stryker. But from then on it all goes downhill.

The scene where he is injected with adamantium was incredibly underwhelming, I understand it would be too scary to show to a general audience. But it’s heavily toned down compared to the very brief but intense flashbacks from the first two films, that it doesn’t match up well at all. The flashbacks succeed in showing how intensely traumatic it must’ve been for him, I didn’t get any of that from the scene, maybe a slight discomfort but that’s it.

From then on the main plot is pretty much exposition for Stryker’s plot in X-Men 2, which is pointless because we’ve seen X-Men 2 we know what happens. Apart from bits of the first act nothing about this prequel adds anything to Wolverine’s backstory that’s worth knowing or that we already learnt from X-Men 2. Since Wolverine never remembers the events of the film – then why should we?

There are no stakes in this in this film, not only do we know where Stryker’s plot is going but also we were never worried about Wolverine since he can’t die therefore no danger. That is why The Wolverine works so much better as a solo film, it found a way to put the character in danger therefore there were stakes and we cared what was going to happen.

This film wastes a lot of talented actors. Hugh Jackman is great but he’s not given anything new to challenge his performance. Liev Schreiber, Danny Huston, Ryan Reynolds are well cast but sadly can’t save the film.


If you are curious about Wolverine’s backstory then the first act is worth watching, just turn off when you get the adamuntium scene.


Monday 14 April 2014

Why Lucy Beale Needs To Die

Well this is it, the week that will end in the death of Lucy Beale.

It had been officially announced in February that EastEnders will take a dark turn as Lucy Beale, daughter of Ian Beale, would be killed off. Which will lead to a 10-month murder mystery that will be revealed in 30th Anniversary episode.

The question is  - Why? Lucy is a great character – why does she need to die? Why not kill Peter?

EastEnders is well known for it’s murders, the very first episode opened with a death … remember Reg Cox? If not then you sure remember the murder of Archie Mitchell and the big revelation that it was Stacey Slater who killed him in the 25th Anniversary episode.

It makes sense now to do a big whodunit for the 30th Anniversary. Considering Ian Beale is the longest serving character on the show and by killing off one his children, especially not long after his mental breakdown arc, it brings the murder plot closer to home and bound to make the soap even more dramatic than was it ever before.



Lucy is a complex character, her whole life has been portrayed on-screen since birth and it has been unusual – Her mother tried to kill Ian; Ian married Mel under the false pretense that Lucy had cancer; 3 stepmothers. Over the past decade we’ve seen Lucy show signs of teenage rebellion – shoplifting, drinking alcohol, dressing inappropriately, which leads to her attempting to have underage sex with an older boy. Things go from bad to worse – advertising a large house party on the internet; running away; abortion. A lot of Lucy’s problems stem from her relationship to her father – he’s often treated Peter as a favourite and treats her like 2nd fiddle to most other things – none of that is more obvious than when he chose Mandy over her before his breakdown.

For a complex character with a lot of baggage it seems to strange have her die. I personally am not a big fan of Peter and killing him off seems more like a better option. However that’s the thing about is – I wouldn’t care. I’d be interested in who’d kill him but I wouldn’t think he’d be a big loss to the show because I don’t think he’s that interesting- most of you may disagree with me. But I feel Lucy’s death will give us not only a stronger sense of big loss but also a more fascinating opportunity to study her character, that I don’t think would be achieved if Peter dies.

One of the things I noticed about the Archie Mitchell murder plot, is that we know a lot of things about him but then at the 11th hour before his death we find out something else (he raped Stacey), which led to more revelations about his character after his death (he had a son and he raped Ronnie as a child). It got me thinking about murder mystery stories in general, the most interesting ones are the one where we get a bit of a character study about the victim even though they don’t physically take part in the story.

That is what we shall get with this story, we’ll get a twist and turn over Lucy this week but after she dies we will get to learn more about her. As Ian and other characters will be questioning about the circumstances of Lucy’s death and what she was up to. It has been mentioned Ian will question how well he knew his daughter, I’m sure we’ll follow him in solving the mystery of his Lucy’s character. That’s why I don’t think Peter dying would work, I can’t imagine a character study on him that will be nearly as elaborate or engaging as a character study on Lucy.

Then there adds to the tragedy when we get Ian learn about his daughter for better or worse, it doesn’t change the fact that she’s dead. It’s not like when she ran away and he could make amends with her, he can’t go back and reconcile whatever he finds out. Whatever the status of their father and daughter relationship is before her death will stay with her death.



Now the big question – Who kills Lucy?

I’m willing to bet it will be Peter. Don’t me wrong I don’t think he’s evil or sick, I just think it will be a great twist and make the story even darker. I reckon it will be an accident, he probably won’t even know she’s dead until after her body is found. He’s already responsible for an accidental death while he was in Devon. It will make an excellent arc for his character and make much him more interesting and he’d carry on the complexities of his twin sister with him. However I’m not the best at murder mysteries – on the Archie Mitchell I was suspecting every character (I was even at one thought it was Danielle from beyond the grave) except Stacey.

Her exit storyline seems to be centered around her setting up an estate agent business with best friend Lauren Branning, while have an affair with Lauren’s father Max. There’s also an upcoming love triangle between Lucy and Whitney Dean over Lee Carter. All of this just seems like red herrings to me, I’d be amazed if I’m wrong I just can’t imagine any of these characters being involved in her death. Well except Lauren, after all she almost killed Max running him over but I think she’s too predictable. I really hope the revelation is grounded in the Beale family, it will keep it more dark and personal.